🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.